+ Before the Lakers and Hornets tipped off their Game 2 the other night, I heard someone refer to it as an "almost must-win" for the Lakers. And just Friday morning, I see ESPN is saying the Knicks, currently in an 0-2 hole against Boston, are in a must-win scenario. Is that series a best-of-five? Because I've been under the impression that all first-round series in the NBA playoffs are best-of-seven. And in such a case, a team trailing 0-2 is not up against the ole must-win pressure. Don't get me wrong, the Knicks would be far better off winning Game 3 at Madison Square Garden tonight to pull to within 2-1, rather than losing and falling behind 3-0. But that would be stating the overly obvious. Unless a team faces an elimination game, it is not a must-win game. Maybe invent a new term like "a really-should-win game." The manufacturing of drama has got to end in sports broadcasting.
+ Doug Collins had the quote of the week when he was asked if he believes in moral victories. The veteran coach's 76ers had just lost Game 3 and fallen behind 3-0 to the Miami Heat when he issued the following answer last night: "What the hell? I'm 60 years old. I'm a moral person but I don't like moral victories."
+ I never thought I'd be looking ahead to this season's remaining games between Kansas City and Cleveland, but the teams will square off three times again next week and a total of 14 more times the rest of the year. The Indians and Royals just split a four-game series that had a little bit of everything: a pair of one-run games, a walk-off winner, a couple of late-inning rallies that fell short, an extra-inning game, some good pitching, good defense and a little bit of offense. No MLB series this week had what the Indians and Royals offered, and they ended it the same way they began: one-game apart atop the AL Central, and owners of the two highest win totals in baseball. I'd love to think one of these teams is not a fluke, that their series in Cleveland in late July will matter to somebody.